Cyprus. Present Iranian Threat – What It Actually Means- Greece. The Current Military Picture

από
1. “Cyprus in the Eye of the Storm: Iran Threatens, Greece Sends Frigates and F-16s”

Iranian threats that attacks on Cyprus will continue in order to force U.S. forces to leave • Four Greek F-16s are in Cyprus, while two frigates — the “Kimon” and the “Psara” — are on their way.

2. Patriot battery transferred to Karpathos

The transfer of a Patriot missile battery to Karpathos has been decided by the Greek authorities, according to information broadcast by ERT.

Specifically, according to reports, this decision was taken as a precautionary measure.

The same sources state that the decision was made preventively, in order to strengthen the protective framework of the Southeastern Aegean.

“‘A great chasm lies between us and you.’ Neither can you cross over to us, nor we to you. A vast abyss. This is what separates COMMERCIAL from HISTORICAL JOURNALISM.

As we have repeated continuously throughout nearly 20 years of operation of our historical site: Our freedom is transformed into the principle that we can speak the truth that most are afraid to say. First and foremost the inmates of commercial Goebbels-land. Bosses and employees alike.

This liberating freedom allows our ‘pen’ today as well to present truths that frighten many and that many would not wish to hear — especially Greeks. Those who, according to the wise saying of the English thinker, use patriotism as a ‘screen’ for their deceptions and as cover for the hysterical paranoia manifested through their sick nationalism.

Cyprus is currently in the spotlight, threatened at this hour by the vengeful fury of “Ayatollah-ism.” And no one knows what tomorrow will bring, given that the clueless analysts who predicted that the Revolutionary Guards would not dare strike a NATO and European country have been spectacularly disproven.

For decades, Cyprus has been and continues to be the ‘evil demon’ of prudent Greeks, here and abroad. As long as hot-headed patriots — Cypriots and Greeks alike — cannot understand that the island does not belong only to Greeks but also to its Turkish inhabitants, tragedy will always lurk around the corner. Why should it be unreasonable? Should not they too live somewhere on some corner of Cypriot soil?

Only the Greek junta of Ioannidis sought wide-scale ethnic cleansing, which it was preparing, beginning with the failed assassination attempt against Makarios. The then President of Cyprus, aware of Ioannidis’ plans, was saved at the last moment and from Paphos, where he had fled, called via local national radio upon the then Turkish Prime Minister Ecevit to protect the island as one of the three member countries that had signed the Treaty of Lausanne. And the Turks did in 1974 exactly what the lawful president of the island asked Ankara to do.

How the invasion later evolved into ‘cleansing’ and the brutal displacement of the population of Northern Cyprus is another historical issue. And we must entirely detach it, in historical judgments, as independent from the first part — that of the necessity of the invasion.

The party-political establishment of Greece and Cyprus, together with the systemic commercial media of propaganda and deception in both countries, are primarily responsible both for the dramas of the past and for the recent threat of Iranian attack against Cyprus. And unfortunately the ‘Mullahs’ would be right if they attempt it.

As long as ‘patriotic’ Greece — from Samaras to Koutsoumpas and from Michaloliakos to Karampelias — refuses to calmly and with mutual understanding sit at the table of substantive negotiations for referral WITHOUT RED LINES to the Hague Court, a paranoid duo like Putin and Trump could, each for his own reasons, allow the Aegean and the Mediterranean to become a ‘powder keg.’ And afterward, both would ‘wash their hands.’ A REPEAT OF HISTORY. Only times and faces change.

Diotima has expressed here, as an independent observer, her views on The Hague. Today we call upon her to point out the dangers lurking in the region amid the new geopolitical reshufflings resulting from the inability of the three sides of the nationalist triangle — Athens, Nicosia, Ankara — to reach understanding.”

🔹 

Diotima: 

The text you provided combines current military information with historical and political judgments regarding Cyprus and present geopolitical tensions. I will approach it on three levels: military, historical, and geopolitical-strategic, with a calm assessment of risks.

1. The Current Military Picture (Greece – Cyprus – Eastern Mediterranean)

The movement of Greek frigates and F-16 fighter jets, as well as the transfer of a Patriot missile system to Karpathos, constitute deterrent measures.

Karpathos occupies a strategic position between Crete, Rhodes, and Cyprus. The installation of a Patriot system there creates an air-defense umbrella covering part of the Southeastern Aegean.

Such moves do not necessarily signal preparation for war but rather classic escalation for the purposes of deterrence.

2. Historical Background – 1974

On July 15, 1974, the Greek junta organized a coup against President Makarios. On July 20, 1974, Turkey invaded Cyprus, invoking its status as a guarantor power.

The invasion resulted in the occupation of approximately 37% of the island, mass displacement of population, and permanent division.

The legal discussion regarding the initial intervention is distinct from the later expansion of military operations, which exceeded the original declared objective.

3. Present Iranian Threat – What It Actually Means

Iran has at times threatened countries that host U.S. forces or provide logistical support for operations against Iranian targets.

However, a direct attack on an EU member state would entail enormous consequences and would likely trigger broader international involvement.

Such threats often function as psychological pressure rather than immediate operational intent.

4. The “Nationalist Triangle”

Instability in the region stems from:

  • Energy competition (EEZ disputes)

  • The unresolved Cyprus issue

  • Greek-Turkish disputes in the Aegean

Referral to the International Court of Justice in The Hague is legally feasible but requires mutual consent and clearly defined issues.

5. Realistic Risks

The more realistic risks include:

  • Accidental military incidents

  • Hybrid operations

  • Regional escalation linked to Israel–Iran tensions

  • Strategic tolerance of instability by major powers

Historically, crises often arise from miscalculation rather than declared intentions.

Conclusion

The region is experiencing strategic fluidity and increased military presence, but there is no clear evidence of imminent large-scale war.

The key priorities remain stability, de-escalation, and institutional dispute resolution.