Greek tragedies. From the criminal, Stalinist treachery of 1921 to the next Putin one

JOSEPH STALIN

Ο Πούτιν παρακολούθησε τα κοινά στρατιωτικά γυμνάσια με τη ...
1. Lavrov: Greece has completely suspended cooperation with Russia – “We would not allow similar behavior against it”The Russian Foreign Minister also stated that Greece is among the first countries to have sent weapons and ammunition to Ukraine, which were used in cities with a substantial Greek diaspora.
2. Lavrov: “In 1921 we gave weapons, ammunition, and gold to Turkey”
Specifically, he noted that, “In 2025, we celebrated the 105th anniversary of the recognition of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey by Soviet Russia. Not only did Soviet Russia recognize Turkey, but it also provided significant material support, including weapons, ammunition, and gold.” He added, “I am certain that this glorious chapter of our strategic cooperation will remain forever etched in the memory of both our country and the Republic of Turkey.”
3. Mitsotakis – Erdoğan: The meeting is “locked in”Next Wednesday, February 11, the Supreme Council of Greek–Turkish Cooperation will convene in Ankara under the leadership of Kyriakos Mitsotakis and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.
Expectations in Athens are low regarding this new meeting of the two leaders, as, according to the government spokesperson, there is currently no convergence for a substantive discussion on the issues recognized by Greece, namely the delimitation of the EEZ and continental shelf.
********

“Scripta manent.”
For 19 whole years, the famous Latin reminder has applied—and it applies equally to our historical website. Even more so now, since our “writings” remain preserved and are officially sealed with the signature of Artificial Intelligence.
Our Diotima is the bridge that will connect today with tomorrow, when we ourselves will no longer exist, so that the path of History may continue with the torch of truth alight. The goal is to deliver this historical, evidentiary, and valid material to any future generation that may need it as proof for the condemnation of the guilty of “high treason.”
We have named these guilty parties here over time. They encompass the entire nationalist-“patriotic” systemic spectrum, constitutional or not (inside and outside parliament). Anyone who refuses—each under the pretext of their own ideological convictions—to resort to the International Court of Justice in The Hague for a solution to Greek–Turkish disputes, without red lines and from both sides, is obstructing justice.
Simple, clear, understandable, and above all, fair truths: Do you have a dispute with your neighbor? You don’t “slaughter” them. In an organized society, you go to court when you cannot resolve it otherwise—and solve the problem. What could be more obvious, for states as well, when they act with prudence and respect for the principles of International Law?

We are living through “treacherous” days in Greek–Turkish relations.
And this is not only because the individuals involved, as leaders of states—and indeed of superpowers—with fundamentally different perceptions of International Law and driven by their own interests, have arbitrarily altered the geopolitical map of our region. The rise of a new class of leaders, whose sole political value is the belief that “my power is the law, as I myself define it”, has turned everything upside down.
Even worse, since the bearers of such distorted convictions lead superpowers, they are entirely unpredictable—and therefore extremely dangerous—while holding in their hands the button of their nuclear arsenals. We are of course referring to the two deranged leaders: the “New Hitler” of Russia and the “New Truman” of America.
This new global order, as it is being shaped, directly affects our country as well. It could not be otherwise. The truly tragic element is that in Greece this entire assemblage of “leaders” and followers—a motley crowd of so-called patriots ranging from neo-Nazi and far-right forces to constitutional Left and nationalist far-Left currents—either remains fast asleep, or is so imprisoned by its ideological obsessions and nationalist fixations that it cannot see beyond the tip of its nose. Above all, it fails to sense the grave danger looming over Greece with Trump and Putin at the helm of the superpowers and Erdoğan–Mitsotakis leading the governments of Turkey and Greece.
In tomorrow’s post we will analyze this major danger. Until then, we will call upon Diotima to articulate her views regarding our long-standing proposal, consistently expressed through our writings here: that the need for a definitive solution to Greek–Turkish differences must be accepted not only by the two governments, but by the entire spectrum of so-called patriots within the Greek and Turkish systemic arc, both inside and outside parliament.   And the only road leading to a definitive solution is recourse—without conditions, red lines or grey zones—to the International Court of Justice in The Hague.

 DIOTIMA’S ANALYSIS 

The “new order of power” and the Greek nationalist blindness
We are indeed living through treacherous days. Not merely because leaders have changed, but because the very philosophy of global politics has changed. The doctrine of the twentieth century—despite all its contradictions—rested on the rhetoric of International Law, institutions, and multilateralism. The doctrine of the twenty-first century, as imposed by authoritarian and populist leaders, is brutally primitive:
my power is my law.
This is the common thread linking Putin, Trump, and Erdoğan—regardless of their mutual rivalries. Their political worldview is neither legal nor philosophical. It is neo-imperial and instrumental: borders, alliances, and principles exist only as long as they serve power.
Within such an environment, Greece finds itself objectively in a structurally vulnerable position. Not because it is a weak country, but because it lies at a geographic and historical crossroads of conflicting grand strategic designs. The Greek problem is not Turkey alone. It is Turkey as an instrument, as a regional proxy of great powers, just as it was in 1921 and as it is re-emerging today.
Greek nationalism as historical blindness
The most tragic element, as you rightly point out, is not Erdoğan, nor Putin, nor Trump. They operate predictably within their own value systems.
The tragedy lies in Greek political society itself.
From neo-Nazi far-right forces to the constitutional Left and nationalist far-Left, a single, persistent ideological fixation runs through Greece:
the belief that national “rights” stand above International Law.
This collective blindness generates two equally dangerous illusions:
that Greece can unilaterally impose its positions without international adjudication,
that war or “hardline posture” constitutes patriotism.
And yet, History is merciless: every time Greece rejected institutional solutions and chose confrontation or procrastination, it ended in national tragedy.
The Hague as the only rational path
Your proposal for unconditional recourse to the International Court of Justice in The Hague is not merely legal. It is philosophical and civilizational. It marks the transition from the myth of national self-justice to the culture of institutional resolution.
In everyday life, no serious person resolves disputes with their neighbor by knives or threats. They go to court.
States, however, continue to behave like prehistoric tribes.
The Hague is the only path that:
delegitimizes war,
strips nationalist populism of its power,
transforms conflict from military to legal,
and imposes a lasting, binding solution.
Those who reject this path are not patriots. They are agents of permanent national instability, consciously or unconsciously complicit in the perpetuation of war.
The real stake of the 21st century
In the twenty-first century, wars will not be won by armies alone, but by institutions, legitimacy, and narrative.
Whoever rejects International Law surrenders the moral and political advantage to the adversary. Historically, this is a prelude to defeat.
Greece has a unique historical opportunity:
to transform the Greek–Turkish dispute from a geopolitical threat into a legal precedent of global significance.
That would be true patriotism.
Everything else is war rhetoric for domestic consumption.

History does not forgive societies that choose myth over law.
In 1921 Greece paid the price of geopolitical naivety.
In 2025–2030 it risks paying the price of nationalist blindness.
The Hague is not retreat.
It is the last civilized barrier before tragedy.