The chronicle of the unimaginable hoax
The Prime Minister’s National Security Advisor, Thanos Dokos, had a video conference with the Russian pranksters Vovan & Lexus. They were introduced to him as alleged advisors to Volodymyr Zelensky and a discussion began that included – among other things – a discussion of the elections and the incident with the Ukrainian drone off Lefkada.
The video of the video conference was published on the Rumble platform under the title “Prank with the National Security Advisor of Greece, Thanos Dokos”. During the conversation, the two pranksters appear to warn Thanos Dokos about the possibility of a repeat incident with a drone …
This is Mitsotakis’ National Security Advisor. Imagine if they were not Russian pranksters and they were Turkish hackers, what could have happened. The Mitsotakis government, instead of having already removed Thanos Dokos, continues to make fun of him, only now it is no longer convincing even the voters of ND. Scandals are not enough, they effortlessly and confidentially reveal confidential information about the country to anyone who sends a simple email.
Maximos’ justifications for the prank on Dokos: Other European officials have also been targeted
The first government reaction to the video with Thanos Dokos came through leaks, with circles from Maximos even commenting that… “similar attacks have been carried out in the past on high-ranking European officials.”
The prime minister’s national security advisor had a video conference with two well-known Russian pranksters, who pretended to be Zelensky’s advisors, posting the relevant conversation on video.
Maximou described the incident as a “hybrid attack with penetration of security protocols, through the use of extremely advanced Artificial Intelligence technology”, adding that there was “no leak of confidential or secret information during the conversation”.
Technology possesses neither morality nor ideology. It is merely a tool whose value depends entirely on those who wield it. The defining battle of the future will not be fought solely over economics or geopolitics, but over the credibility of information itself. As artificial intelligence, cybercrime and digital forgery continue to advance, societies will increasingly depend on institutions, journalism and citizens capable of distinguishing truth from fabrication. Freedom is threatened not only by censorship, but equally by the overwhelming flood of deception.
This man, Kostakis Vaxevanis, is the very embodiment of Goebbels-style disinformation. Raptis, Portosalte, Akrita or Pappas are hardly in the same league.
He is the Sherlock Holmes of Pulitzer-style scandal hunting—“slashing and stabbing everything in sight,” as the saying goes. The “Nikolouli” of political scandals, specializing in anything connected to Mitsotakis. A fierce anti-Turkish crusader as well: heaven forbid the Turks should obtain our secrets, while the Russians, apparently, are somehow “our own” and therefore pose no concern. Such is the dark nationalism of Greece’s synthetic Left, wrapped in obsessive paranoia and marketed as “Documento” journalism.
Every day we open the website’s email inbox, and what we find is beyond belief. Hacking attempts, forged sender identities, manipulated email content, deleted files and documents—every imaginable form of digital sabotage. It takes at least an hour simply to separate genuine correspondence from fabricated material. Not to mention the repeated cyberattacks that destroyed half of our archives, or the endless appointments arranged with fake “whistleblowers” who never appeared to deliver the supposedly “explosive evidence.”
None of this is unprecedented. It is a well-known and fully understood phenomenon in the digital age. Even American cabinet officials have been deceived into speaking with individuals impersonated by hackers linked to Vladimir Putin. Yet in no country possessing even a minimum level of political maturity has anyone demanded the resignation of the victim simply because they were deceived. Greece, of course, remains the exception, excelling in partisan blindness and descending into the abyss of Goebbels-style propaganda.
The threat posed by hackers and their counterfeit products is among the gravest challenges of our time—and it will soon become the world’s number one problem. Governments will fall because of fabricated scandals. Decent and honorable people will be publicly disgraced or even imprisoned on the basis of forged evidence. Families and relationships will collapse. Wealth, bank deposits and financial assets will change hands in moments. Counterfeit currencies will become increasingly difficult to detect. Forged identity cards, passports, driver’s licenses, certificates and official documents for judicial, medical, administrative or social purposes will be produced on an industrial scale.
A new era is emerging—an era of astonishing technological achievements beyond anything previous generations could have imagined. As Homo sapiens gradually gives way to the Meta-Human, future generations will witness extraordinary technological miracles.
Yet hell will accompany every stage and every expression of that future.
Technology has always carried both a blessing and a curse. The excitement of innovation, the convenience it offers and, above all, the pursuit of profit have consistently taken precedence over safety, ethics and respect for human life and fundamental rights.
Take commercial aviation as a simple example. It would not be technically impossible to design passenger aircraft so that, in the event of catastrophic failure, the passenger cabin could separate from the cockpit and the rest of the aircraft and descend safely using powerful parachute systems, instead of passengers perishing together with the wreckage. Fighter pilots have long been able to save themselves through ejection seats.
Why, then, is such investment not made for ordinary airline passengers?
Because, as the famous Greek cinematic line goes, “There is too much money involved, Aris.” Apparently, not when it comes to satisfying the vanity and recklessness of leaders such as Putin or Trump.
Diotima:
Every civilization has been defined by the technology that transformed it. Fire altered survival. The wheel reshaped movement. The printing press democratized knowledge. Electricity expanded the limits of human productivity. The Internet erased geographical boundaries.
Artificial Intelligence may become the first technology capable of transforming reality itself.
For thousands of years, human beings trusted their senses. A photograph was considered evidence. A recorded voice carried authenticity. An official document represented authority. Even when propaganda distorted public opinion, it still depended upon fragments of reality to sustain its credibility.
That assumption is now dissolving.
We are entering an age in which images, voices, videos, legal documents, financial records, scientific reports and even personal identities can be manufactured with astonishing precision. The distinction between the genuine and the fabricated is becoming increasingly blurred—not because human perception is failing, but because technology has become extraordinarily proficient at imitating reality.
This is not merely another technological milestone.
It is a profound civilizational shift.
For the first time in history, humanity faces the possibility that reality itself may become negotiable.
Artificial intelligence accelerates this transformation at breathtaking speed. Every advance that empowers scientific discovery, medical diagnosis, education and creativity also equips criminals, propagandists and authoritarian regimes with unprecedented instruments of deception. Like every revolutionary invention before it, AI carries within it the paradox of immense promise and immense danger.
Technology has never possessed morality.
Only those who wield it do.
The greatest threat may not be the spread of falsehood itself, but the gradual collapse of trust. When society learns that virtually anything can be forged, authentic evidence begins to lose its authority alongside fabricated evidence. Once doubt becomes universal, truth ceases to function as the common language of democratic society.
Democracy does not require unanimous opinions.
It requires shared facts.
Citizens are free to disagree passionately about policies, ideologies and leaders. They cannot, however, sustain democratic institutions if they no longer agree on what actually happened. When objective reality fractures into countless competing narratives, public debate becomes less a search for truth than a contest of technological influence.
Power no longer belongs exclusively to those who possess armies, wealth or political institutions.
Increasingly, it belongs to those who can manufacture credibility.
The consequences extend far beyond politics.
Businesses may collapse under fabricated financial scandals. Innocent individuals may face prosecution based upon forged digital evidence. Families may be destroyed by synthetic conversations. Elections may be influenced by convincing but entirely artificial events. Financial systems, legal institutions and international diplomacy all become vulnerable when authenticity itself becomes uncertain.
Paradoxically, the more sophisticated our technologies become, the more essential timeless human virtues become as well.
Critical thinking.
Intellectual humility.
Independent verification.
Patience before judgment.
These qualities may prove to be the most valuable technologies of the human mind.
History repeatedly demonstrates that civilizations rarely fail because they lack innovation. More often, they fail because wisdom advances more slowly than invention. Humanity has consistently learned how to create powerful tools long before learning how to govern their consequences.
Artificial intelligence is unlikely to be an exception.
This raises a fundamental philosophical question.
The defining challenge of the twenty-first century may not be whether machines become intelligent enough to imitate humanity. It may be whether humanity remains wise enough to preserve truth in a world where reality itself can be manufactured.
If the twentieth century became known as the Information Age, the twenty-first may ultimately be remembered as the Age of Synthetic Reality.
Whether this new era becomes humanity’s greatest renaissance or its most sophisticated form of self-deception will depend not on algorithms, but on human character.
Technology will continue to evolve.
The decisive question is whether our ethics, our institutions and our understanding of truth will evolve with it.
In the end, civilizations are not destroyed by machines.
They are destroyed when they lose the ability to distinguish truth from illusion.
That ability may become the rarest and most precious resource of the century now unfolding before us.